Written by: Paul Rubin

Primary Source: OR in an OB World

A recent question on OR-Exchange dealt with the *reciprocal normal distribution*. Specifically, if k is a constant and X is a Gaussian random variable, the distribution of Y=k/X is reciprocal normal. The poster had questions about approximating the distribution of Y with a Gaussian (normal) distribution.

This gave me a reason (excuse?) to tackle something on my to-do list: learning to use Shiny to create an interactive document containing statistical analysis (or at least statistical mumbo-jumbo). I won’t repeat the full discussion here, but instead will link the Shiny document I created. It lets you tweak settings for an example of a reciprocal normal variable and judge for yourself how well various normal approximations fit. I’ll just make a few short observations here:

- No way does Y actually have a normal distribution.
- Dividing by X suggests that you probably should be using a distribution with finite tails (e.g., a truncated normal distribution) for X. In particular, the original question had X being speed of something, k being (fixed) distance to travel and Y being travel time. Unless the driver is fond of randomly jamming the gear shift into reverse, chances are X should be nonnegative; and unless this vehicle wants to break all laws of physics, X probably should have a finite upper bound (check local posted speed limits for suggestions). That said, I yield to the tendency of academics to prefer tractible/well-known approximations (e.g., normal) over realistic ones.
- The coefficient of variation of X will be a key factor in determining whether approximating the distribution of Y with a normal distribution is “good enough for government work”. The smaller the coefficient of variation, the less likely it is that X wanders near zero, where bad things happen. In particular, the less likely it is that X gets anywhere near zero, the less skewness Y suffers.
- There is no one obvious way to pick parameters (mean and standard deviation) for a normal approximation to Y. I’ve suggested a few in the Shiny application, and you can try them to see their effect.

I’d also like to give a shout-out to the tools I used to generate the interactive document, and to the folks at RStudio.com for providing free hosting at ShinyApps.io. The tool chain was:

- R (version 3.1.1) to do the computations;
- R Studio as the IDE for development (highly recommended);
- R Markdown as the “language” for the document;
- Shiny to handle the interactive parts;
- various R packages/tools to generate the final product.

It’s obvious that a lot of loving effort (and probably no small amount of swearing) has gone into the development of all those tools.

#### Latest posts by Paul Rubin (see all)

- Piecewise Linear Approximations in MIP Models - March 11, 2018
- More on “Core Points” - January 18, 2018
- Finding a “Core Point” - January 17, 2018